×
It looks like you're using an obsolete version of internet explorer. Internet explorer is no longer supported by Microsoft since the end of 2015. We invite you to use a newer browser such as Firefox, Google Chrome or Microsoft Edge.
Back to playlist

Commented videos

  • Alexander P.

    Alexander P. Why DES in distal LAD ? BVS Absorb?

    2017-08-15, 13h18
    • Daniel W.

      Daniel W. Hi Alexander. Thank you for your question. We know from the Absorb data that scaffolds perform worse than DES in smaller vessels, associated with a higher MACE rate. An alternative could be treating small vessels with DCB. The BASKET small study result will be presented in 2018 (DES vs DCB in small vessels). DCB are good in our experience when you have TIMI flow III, no more than a dissection A or B, and less than 30% residual stenosis.

      2017-10-29, 17h08
    Join files
    Please, select your files, click upload button, write your comment and click the send button. (allowed formats : images jpeg, gif, png, and PDF)
    Your browser doesn't have Flash, Silverlight or HTML5 support.


Scroll Up